Why "Joy Luck" Brings me Misery (3 of 3)My angst with JLC is that it plays upon all of the Asian stereotypes
that were described in my opening paragraph. Asian women are depicted
as lonely miserable characters whose ultimate salvation comes when united
in marriage with a white male. Furthermore, the author mercilessly smears
all of the Asian male characters, confining them to the role of the wife-abuser,
or the nit-picking egomaniac. That a novel inclusive of such detrimental
stereotypes is touted as the representative of the AA experience, that
it is highly acclaimed by critics, and that the concerns regarding its
portrayal of Asian Americans comes only from other Asian Americans is
as puzzling to me as racism itself. When Amy Tan (who is, in real life,
married to a white man) herself asserts that she would never date an
Asian man because she would not date her father or her brother, how can
anyone not question the impetus behind the fiction she creates? If a
prominent white figure claimed that she would never date a white man
because he would remind her of her brother, or even if a prominent black
figure claimed that she would never date a black man because she would
never date her father, the public would certainly question the mental
well-being of the individual. But in Amy Tan's case, neither the personal
comment nor the dynamics between Asian men and women in JLC are questioned.
Could this be because the public believes that she represents the collective
voice of Asian America? In such a "PC" country, certainly no
one would dare object to the morale of an entire ethnic group. If you are interested in helping or supporting Julia's campaign, you may e-mail her. |
|
| |